April 26, 2004
Climate change research focuses on precipitation
levels
By Jennifer McNulty
It was a classic aha! moment. Driving along Highway 395
on the eastern side of the Sierra, climate change researcher Michael
Loik suddenly saw the nondescript Caltrans snow fences along the roadway
as untapped gold mines of information.
Michael Loik has received a $104,000 grant to explore long-term
effects of altered snow depth on species composition, soil carbon
and nitrogen levels, and water availability. Photo:
Jennifer McNulty |
Installed near Mammoth Lakes by the state highway department in the
1950s, the fences were constructed hundreds of feet upwind of the road
to keep wind-driven snow off the highway. Each winter, snow drifts build
up along the eastern side of the fences, helping keep the road open
with minimal plowing.
Loik realized that for 50 years, those fences had been altering precipitation
levels for nearby shrubs--precisely what Loik had been modeling in nearby
research plots.
It struck me that by looking at the shrubs on either side of
the snow fences, we could evaluate the actual effects of higher and
lower amounts of precipitation over time, said Loik, an assistant
professor of environmental studies at UCSC who began conducting climate
change experiments in the Mammoth Lakes area in 1999.
Loiks revelation resonated with the M. Theo Kearney Foundation
of Soil Science, which recently awarded him a $104,000 grant to explore
long-term effects of altered snow depth on species composition, soil
carbon and nitrogen levels, and water availability.
The new project is a major boost for Loik and graduate students Alden
Griffith and Holly Alpert, who are investigating the effects on the
desert ecosystem of changes in precipitation caused by global warming.
Its unusual to have this kind of temporal and spatial data
for a climate change experiment, said Loik.
Loik conducts his research at the headwaters of the Owens River in
eastern California, which has been engineered to quench the thirst of
greater Los Angeles. Loik evaluates the effects of precipitation on
plants as well as the fate of water, which evaporates, recharges groundwater
supplies, or runs off the surface, depending on rain and snowfall levels.
He is the founding director of PrecipNet, an international network dedicated
to focusing on the precipitation aspects of climate change.
Precipitation patterns are expected to change as part of other
global changes, like increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,
rising temperatures, rising sea levels, and the melting of polar ice
caps, said Loik. But changes in rain and snowfall could
potentially be a lot more important than changes in temperature, especially
in the arid western United States.
The Owens River is a key water resource for the rest of the state,
noted Loik, whose work is of great interest to the Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power, Southern California Edison, the California Department
of Transportation, and the Mammoth Community Water District.
Like the rest of the state, the future of Mammoth Lakes is closely
linked to water resources. With 3,500 residents, Mammoth is a geographically
isolated winter resort area that hosts 26,500 visitors per day. With
12 million visitor days per year, the Inyo National Forest is a more
popular destination than Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National
Park, and the Grand Canyon combined, said Loik.
Loiks work seeks to fill a data gap that could bedevil the most
determined planners and policy makers: There is no consensus on whether
precipitation is expected to rise or fall with global climate change.
The most highly regarded computer models predict effects that vary from
a 20 percent reduction in precipitation to an increase of more than
200 percent.
Loik has responded by embracing uncertainty in his experimental
design. Two shrubs are at the center of Loiks work on vegetation:
antelope bitterbrush and sagebrush. Each summer, Loiks team simulates
thunderstorms over some experimental plots and builds shelters that
deflect water away from others. In the winter, they manipulate snow
levels, which is why Loiks insight about the snow fences was so
valuable.
We have to act out the range of possible scenarios to understand
the different potential impacts on the ecosystem, said Loik. The
goal is to apply our results to issues of land management and water
policy. Decision makers have to plan for all contingencies to be able
to mitigate or adapt to changes in river flows.
Return to Front Page
|